Dear Mr. Merkley, Mr. Wyden, Mr. DeFazio, Mrs. Close, Mrs. Gelser,
I am writing to you as a concerned citizen who resides in
your district and votes. With the recent tragedies in Newtown and the Clackamas
Town Center, I am worried that these senseless acts of violence will be used to
push legislation that will have negative effects on my Second Amendment
rights. If you have noticed, both of
these incidents – along with many more similar ones – have happened in gun-free
zones. Most of the time, these cowardly
shooters also break many other laws to carry out their evil deeds, ignoring
everything but armed resistance.
Passing legislation that bans standard capacity magazines
will not be effective in preventing incidents like these, as the perpetrator
usually carries more than one firearm and can easily reload them. Magazine capacity is rarely a factor in a
shooting. On the other hand, magazine
capacity can play a very important role during a
gunfight because if one side stops shooting to reload, this leaves them
vulnerable to the other side that still has the capacity to return fire. This
is especially true for engagements at closer range (most concealed carry
gunfights happen at this range), because the side with ammo now has an easier
shot to make on a target with very little options. If standard capacity
magazines are banned, it would leave the law-abiding citizen at an extreme
disadvantage if they were ever involved in a gunfight.
Passing legislation
banning so called “assault weapons” will also have very little effect on
incidents like this, and is also unconstitutional. First of all, more homicides
are committed with blunt objects like hammers and clubs than rifles. Second, there are already close to 300
million firearms in the hands of citizens throughout the United States, many of
which would fall under the cosmetic definition of an assault weapon. Banning the sale and manufacture of new
firearms will not put a significant dent in the number of guns in our country,
and again would be very unconstitutional.
I would like to know what you are going to do to protect
my Second Amendment rights, especially against attacks that will come in the
form of an assault weapons ban and magazine capacity restrictions.
Thank you for your time,
Lee Bissinger
My first response.
Dear Lee,
Thank you for your letter. There have certainly been many emails in my inbox in recent weeks about guns and ammunition. While the vast majority of letters from my district have urged greater control of guns and ammunition, I've also received letters like yours offering an alternative perspective. It is my understanding that any gun bills this session are likely to originate in the Senate. I will carefully weigh the policy decisions should I have the opportunity to vote. I am keeping your letter so that I will be sure to have your words and contact information readily available to me at that time.
Many thanks again for writing.
Sara
Representative Sara Gelser
Chair, House Education Committee
House District 16 (Corvallis/Philomath)
All my best,
Jeffrey A. Merkley
United States Senator
Thank you for your letter. There have certainly been many emails in my inbox in recent weeks about guns and ammunition. While the vast majority of letters from my district have urged greater control of guns and ammunition, I've also received letters like yours offering an alternative perspective. It is my understanding that any gun bills this session are likely to originate in the Senate. I will carefully weigh the policy decisions should I have the opportunity to vote. I am keeping your letter so that I will be sure to have your words and contact information readily available to me at that time.
Many thanks again for writing.
Sara
Representative Sara Gelser
Chair, House Education Committee
House District 16 (Corvallis/Philomath)
My Second response.
Dear Lee,
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about legislation and actions being considered to address gun violence. I appreciate hearing from you.
In the wake of the tragic mass shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary and right at home in Clackamas Town Center, I have heard a wide range of views from many Oregonians on gun policies and gun violence. Indeed, I am deeply saddened by these senseless shootings and the loss of innocent lives.
As I consider proposed policies regarding guns, I will have two perspectives. As a supporter of the Second Amendment, I will ask if the proposals meet the constitutional test. Second, I will ask if the proposals will make a difference in the tragic situations we have witnessed. In short, I will be digging into the facts and research about each of the proposals on the table with these perspectives in mind.
It is appropriate in light of the recent tragedies that this is a national discussion, and I'm glad you are sharing your thoughts with me. I will keep your views in mind and hope you will keep me informed about the issues that concern you.
All my best,
Jeffrey A. Merkley
United States Senator